Matej Dodig vs Stijn Slump Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan
Published on 15 Jul at 12:44 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
M. Dodig vs S. Slump

CRO
1
Win
Played
0
Win

NED
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Dodig 1 - 0 Slump
They have played 3 sets in total, with Matej Dodig winning 2 and Stijn Slump winning 1. The last match between Matej Dodig and Stijn Slump was at the Bunschoten Challenger, 15-07-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Matej Dodig getting the victory 4-6 6-4 6-3.
Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Dodig | 1 |
Slump | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) Bunschoten Challenger(07-15-25)
M. Dodig vs S. Slump H2H Profile
M. Dodig vs S. Slump Match Preview:
- Dodig has a slight edge in second serve performance, winning 44.9% of points compared to Slump's 43.71% over the last six months. Can this edge translate into a match win? It might.
- In return games, Dodig outperforms Slump, winning 46.6% on opponent's second serves, whereas Slump captures 41.37%. This advantage extends to first serve returns as well.
- Under pressure, Slump narrowly leads in saving breakpoints, with a 56.07% save rate compared to Dodig's 55.15%.
- Over the past year, Slump holds a higher match win percentage at 55.74%, versus Dodig's 50%. How crucial is this difference? It suggests Slump's consistency.
- Dodig thrives on hard courts with a 68% win rate, while Slump excels on clay, winning 61%. Neither prefers indoor hard courts.
- Dodig mainly competes in Challenger/ITF tournaments, winning 48% of matches, whereas Slump has a better 58.82% win rate in Futures/Satellites.
- Dodig faces stronger opponents with an average ranking of 317.03, superior to Slump's opponents at 383.02.
- In deciding sets, Slump is more effective, winning 53% of the time compared to Dodig's 43%.
- Both have a comparable breakpoint conversion rate, with Slump slightly ahead at 34.21% over Dodig's 32.5%.
Editorial Prediction (July 15, 2025, UTC):
Analyzing recent performance, Dodig displays solid second serve and return game statistics, slightly ahead of Slump in those areas. These factors often correlate strongly with match outcomes, providing Dodig with a potential upper hand in exchanges.
However, Slump's better breakpoint conversion rate and ability to handle deciding sets give her a competitive edge, especially in high-pressure moments. This could prove vital if the match becomes closely contested.
Slump's overall performance consistency with more match wins and slightly easier opponents suggests she is used to capitalizing on such opportunities.
All things considered, while Dodig shows strength in some key areas, Slump's resilience under pressure and her recent win rate tilt the prediction slightly in her favor.
Slump is favored to win this upcoming match.
Matej Dodig vs Stijn Slump Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
M. Dodig vs S. Slump H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
2 | Sets Won | 1 |
16 | Games Won | 13 |
7 | Aces (Total) | 9 |
1 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
2:6:36 | Average Match Time | 2:6:36 |
71% (64/90) | 1st Serve % | 53% (46/87) |
77% (49/64) | 1st Serve Win % | 83% (38/46) |
50% (13/26) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (18/41) |
43% (3/7) | Break Pts Won % | 100% (2/2) |
36% (31/87) | Return Points Win % | 31% (28/90) |
100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
M. Dodig Recent Matches Played
S. Slump Recent Matches Played

M. Dodig vs S. Slump Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
62.70% (116/69) | YTD Win/Loss | 59.18% (145/100) |
59.26% (256/176) | Sets Win/Loss | 58.42% (326/232) |
52.98% (2149/1907) | Games Win/Loss | 53.60% (2785/2411) |
68.18% (15/7) | Hard Win/Loss | 54.55% (24/20) |
63.01% (92/54) | Clay Win/Loss | 60.80% (121/78) |
52.94% (9/8) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0.00% (0/2) |
0.3 | Aces Per Game | 0.28 |
597 | Aces Total | 714 |
0.27 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.21 |
534 | Total Double Faults | 529 |
1:48:19 | Average Match Time | 1:15:9 |
404.18 | Average Opponent Rank | 326.87 |
58% (7498/12914) | 1st Serve % | 54% (6239/11510) |
70% (5222/7498) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (4427/6239) |
50% (2709/5416) | 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (2725/5271) |
41% (577/1391) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (526/1210) |
41% (5171/12713) | Return Points Win % | 40% (4689/11697) |
50.00% (1/1) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
33.33% (1/2) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
51.09% (47/45) | Challenger W/L | 35.29% (6/11) |
76.14% (67/21) | Futures W/L | 60.96% (139/89) |
62% (112/181) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 59% (145/244) |
100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
57% (27/47) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 49% (28/57) |
58% (37/64) | Deciding Set Win % | 48% (32/67) |
84% (114/96) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (150/130) |
16% (114/18) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (150/20) |
28% (71/20) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 16% (95/15) |